Wednesday, 25 October 2023

Ginger Snaps trilogy

Ginger Snaps

Cast: Katharine Isabelle, Emily Perkins, and Mimi Rogers

Director: John Fawcett  

108 minutes (18) 2000    

Second Sight Blu-ray box-set    

Rating: 9/10

Review by Steven Hampton

[Released 30th October]

The Howling meets Carrie with extra weirdness. Socially inept, desperately unhappy, and late starting menstruation, the Fitzgerald sisters, Ginger (Katharine Isabelle) and Brigitte (Emily Perkins), sulk their way through dreary schooldays, and worry throughout lonely nights. They can’t fit in, so they don’t even bother trying - preferring instead to stage an alarmingly proficient series of fake death scenes (their photo evidence of which makes up a compelling backdrop for the opening credits), as an appallingly ghoulish hobby to shock parents, teachers, and terrify neighbours. And, as a predictable side effect, winning them fleeting classroom kudos for dark-side cool.

While the Goth girls are out at night plotting mischief, Ginger is bitten by a werewolf, and has her first period. Following the accidental death of a girl from their school, the sisters’ close relationship is threatened by Ginger’s animal sexuality, Brigitte’s concern for her sibling’s hormonal trauma (interpreted by the older girl as jealousy), and the frequent appearance of yet more blood. Before the next full Moon, Brigitte realises she must find a cure for the ferocity growing in Ginger, or many people will die. She gets help from a young gardener, who suggests a herbal remedy for the girl’s lycanthrope disorder, but even seemingly clueless mum, Pamela (Mimi Rogers), senses that for Ginger, there’s no going back.

Among the details of this clever re-interpretation of werewolf lore there’s a focus on the growing of a dog tail, prior to the main transformation scene of infected teen into ginger-wolf. This permits a narrative that dwells on genre themes of gender roles and bestiality, and the sort of burgeoning sexual perversity evident in Schrader’s remake of Cat People (1982), with signifiers of what critic Barbara Creed has called ‘the monstrous feminine’. Not to mention indirect references to venereal disease (as when Ginger’s sexual partner is horrified to find blood in his urine), incurable cancer, and, the HIV virus. Every excuse for the lurid spilling of blood is fully explored until the body-horrors establish a narrative trajectory leading to poetic tragedy.  

Despite the red stuff that runs, drips, and splatters everywhere, Ginger Snaps (as its title hints) is a black-comedy flush with an understanding of common teenage unease, misery, and stress. DIY body-piercing for Ginger to get a navel ring, is a startling and exceedingly witty update of the usual silver bullet cure for werewolf bites, and further demonstrates the high standard of inventiveness here, for which director John Fawcett, screen-writer Karen Walton, and the young stars, deserve much praise. Although this is letdown during the climactic scenes, by a modest production budget, when clear views of a wholly unconvincing monster’s attack introduce an unwelcome element of pure cartoon over-extension to the action, Ginger Snaps is an excellent horror thriller, with proof of a brave and lively intelligence at work beneath the visceral surface.

Ginger Snaps: Unleashed

Cast: Emily Perkins, Tatiana Maslany, and Katherine Isabelle

Director: Brett Sullivan

94 minutes (18) 2004

Rating: 9/10

Review by Debbie Moon

After the events of Ginger Snaps, surviving sister Brigitte is struggling to find a way to overcome her werewolf nature, while on the run from another of her kind. When she takes an overdose of her dangerous ‘cure’, Brigitte’s sent to a drug rehab project in an otherwise abandoned hospital. Teaming up with a pre-teen named Ghost, who’s obsessed with horror comics and soon works out what the new girl’s problem is, she has to escape before the change happens - or, indeed, her pursuer starts claiming innocent victims. But Brigitte may be in even more danger from an unexpected source...

This fantastic sequel to a low-budget hit, Ginger Snaps 2: Unleashed has all the twisted charms of the original - with genuine shocks and thrills, a dry and disaffected wit, and a sharp eye for the horrors of being a teenager. The hospital setting, a morass of teen bullies, exploitative staff, and a well-meaning mother figure who just can’t accept the real problem, puts a new slant on proceedings, and Megan Martin’s ingenious script keeps up the tension and reserves some terrific shocks for the final reel.

Emily Perkins gives another gripping performance as the haunted Brigitte, fighting for her life, but it’s no insult to her to observe that the breakout performance is young Tatiana Maslany’s as Ghost, possibly the world’s most disturbed pre-teen. Sharp, shocking and dryly amusing, Ginger Snaps 2 is that rare thing - a truly great horror sequel. With another movie soon to follow, catch up while you can.

Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning

Cast: Katherine Isabelle, Emily Perkins, and Nathaniel Arcand 

Director: Grant Harvey 

91 minutes (18) 2004 

Rating: 8/10

Review by Alasdair Stuart         

Ginger Snaps is widely regarded as one of the best, and last, of the postmodern teen-horror subgenre made so famous by Kevin Williamson and Wes Craven’s Scream trilogy. Its blacker than black comedy, acerbic wit and fervent, almost manic bond between its main characters has garnered the film a legion of fans and two follow-ups, filmed back to back. 

However, Ginger Snaps Back: The Beginning is more of a prequel than a sequel and is a genuinely unusual direction to take this franchise. For a start, it’s set in 18th century Canada at an outpost under siege from a legion of werewolves. Brigitte and Ginger are also there, albeit this time as the daughters of an explorer who drowned when their boat was overturned. As the film begins, they’re alone, on horseback, in the middle of nowhere. They’re cold, frightened and have no one to rely on but each other.

This neatly brings the incredibly close relationship between the two in the previous movies into a whole new light. Brigitte and Ginger are utterly co-dependent due to the terrible situation they find themselves in and as a result, they find themselves pushed into increasingly drastic courses of action. As the inhabitants of the fort turn on one another, and finally them, the sisters find that the only people they can rely on are each other. 

This very close, and slightly disturbing, relationship is beautifully drawn and played by Katherine Isabelle and Emily Perkins. Isabelle is hugely impressive as the haunted, frantic young woman struggling to keep her sister alive and herself human whilst Perkins, given the quieter role, is if anything more unsettling. There’s fervour to this incarnation of Brigitte that gives every scene she has a real sense of tension. Whilst Ginger may be the physically more comfortable one, it’s Brigitte whose refusal to back down and absolute refusal to abandon her sister who is ultimately responsible for some of the film’s most disturbing moments. 

With two performances of this strength at its centre, the rest of the film inevitably falls a little by the wayside. The inhabitants of the outpost are drawn for the most part from stock, whether the lecherous soldier played by J.R. Bourne, or Hugh Dillon’s fire-and-brimstone preacher. Only Tom McCamus’ Rowlands and Nathaniel Arcand’s Hunter are standouts. The first, the owner of the settlement, is a great character whose dark secret propels most of the film along. Superficially, he’s the traditional leader, a physically adept and resolutely fair man who in a simpler film would be the hero. Here though he’s far more than that, alternately an ally and enemy to the girls adding another element of chaos to an already unpredictable film. Arcand’s Hunter is much the same, one of the only people who seems able to come and go as he pleases and who never quite chooses a side. He truly comes into his own in the last 20 minutes, as does McCamus in fact, and their performances are at least as strong as the two female leads. 

What really impresses here though is the script. There’s an overwhelming sense of doom to the whole affair as the girls’ actions echo those they took in the earlier films. Even their love for one another becomes a dark, untrustworthy thing, bringing as much pain down on them as it eases. Most importantly though, the fact that the same actresses are playing earlier incarnations of the girls drives home the central idea of inevitability beautifully, as well as tying Ginger and Brigitte neatly into the history of the area.

All in all, Ginger Snaps Back is an intelligent, unusual and remarkably dark prequel. It maintains the same grim humour of the first film and expands on its themes in an unexpected and highly effective way. If only more horror trilogies were this good.

Extras:

GINGER SNAPS -

Commentary by Mary Beth McAndrews and Terry Mesnard

Commentary with director John Fawcett

Commentary with writer Karen Walton

Canadian Uncanny - Stacey Abbott on Ginger Snaps

A Blood Red Moon - interview with John Fawcett

What Are You Wereing? - interview with producer Steve Hoban

The Art Of Horror - interview with storyboard artist Vincenzo Natali

Featurettes:

  • Ginger Snaps: Blood, Teeth And Fur
  • Growing Pains: Puberty in Horror Films
  • The Making of Ginger Snaps

Cast auditions and rehearsals

Deleted scenes with optional director and writer commentaries

Production design Work

Creation of the Beast

Trailers and TV Spots 

GINGER SNAPS UNLEASHED

  • Commentary with director Brett Sullivan
  • Girl, Interrupted - interview with Brett Sullivan
  • The Bloody Lunar Cycle - interview with writer Megan Martin
  • Behind the scenes
  • Deleted scenes with optional director’s commentary
  • Audition tapes
  • Storyboards

GINGER SNAPS BACK: THE BEGINNING

Commentary by director Grant Harvey

Snap! - interview with Grant Harvey

Girls on Film - interview with producer Paula Devonshire

The Making of Ginger Snaps Back

Deleted scenes with optional director’s commentary

Grant Harvey’s video diaries

Monday, 23 October 2023

Spider-Man: Across The Spider-Verse

Cast: Shameik Moore, Hailee Steinfeld, and Brian Tyree Henry

Directors: Joaquim Dos Santos, Kemp Powers, and Justin K. Thompson

140 minutes (PG) 2023 

Sony 4K Ultra HD    

Rating: 6/10

Review by Steven Hampton 

The complexity of alternative worlds in Marvel’s expanding multi-verse means that almost anyone, at any time, can be Spider-Man... so why aren’t you? Can you stand on ceilings, dangle from bridges, hop over highways, or jump between city skyscrapers? If there’s a radioactive spider number ‘42’, perhaps you are supposed to get bitten in this reality of Earth 2023. Emerging from a weirdly trans-dimensional ‘cocoon’ of spoofy super-action, Spider-Man: Into The Spider-Verse (2018) enabled an older, but still quite familiar, Peter Parker (voiced by Jake Johnson) to support his own replacement, youngster Miles Morales (voiced by rapper Shameik Moore), as the NYC neighbourhood’s friendly new kid on the block, gifted with 'the usual', plus invisibility and ‘Venom’ related energy powers.

We get intros for Spider-Woman, alias Gwen Stacy (voice by Hailee Steinfeld, so good as Kate Bishop in Marvel TV series Hawkeye), and other multi-verse Spidey variants, including a b&w Noir (voiced by Nicolas Cage). Apart from the ‘thwip’ of web-shot and many other sound-effect graphics, the picture evokes ‘splash pages’ from print-media, like motion-comics artwork fused with rotoscoped imagery, and split-screen visuals perhaps suggested by Ang Lee’s HULK (2003). “You got a problem with cartoons?” says Peter Porker, mutant pig, Spider-Ham. Well, yes... When any supposedly caricatured characters are hardly original ideas, there’s only mild amusement, instead of clever jokes, to be derived from their particular TV-grade sit-com dialogue.                  

Irreverence blends with poignancy, sometimes skilfully but often very clumsily, especially when the movie-makers are determined to be quite daft about sci-fi possibilities or superheroes’ moral dilemmas. Sadly, meta-fictional concepts are not culturally progressive story-telling, not when their collective impact on this century’s 'Golden Age of Superhero Cinema' is mainly just obvious whimsy and weakly satirical humour. Experimenting with animation techniques, although it's always fascinating to see, can be awkward to watch if the writing team failed to establish any boundaries or solid limitations on keenly creative artistry. So, Into The Spider-Verse felt like a breathless pursuit of the unknown, with exhilarating daredevil thrills intact, but with both feet in the clouds while its head slams into the pavement.


After the multi-verse development in live-action movie Spider-Man: No Way Home (2021), this animated sequel, Spider-Man: Across The Spider-Verse (2023), has fresh inputs resulting in yet another hectic and dizzying spectacle that almost eclipses Marvel’s meta/ multi-verse spin-off stories in their animated series What If..?. Now, ‘Spider-Gwen’ meets Miguel (Oscar Isaac, of Marvel’s Moon Knight show), a time-travelling, humourless ninja-vampire spider-hunk from 2099, where he leads the Spider-Society protecting the canon events of a tangled timeline of multi-verse connections. Here's in-jokes about a Peter Parker, Spider-dad, whose Spider-baby feels like a Disney import. There’s also a Spider-Punk, of course, to play the anti-establishment rebel who’s like a bad influence upon sundry heroes. Miles (remember him?) breaks away from their conservative traditions but risks destroying the webs of coincidence that holds the sprawling ‘cosmos’ of arachnid-champions together. His loner efforts, under the mask, appear pointless while a faceless, pre-determined fate unfolds.


Mopey and slightly dopey soap-opera stuff about relationships always slows the pace to a crawl, even when climbing walls. For live-action movies, good actors might bring a sense of emotional depth or dramatic subtleties to some of those pivotal scenes of motivational appeal, but cartoonish characters generally fail, except in the rare animated productions that strive for genuine photo-realism (like Zemeckis’ Beowulf, Spielberg’s Tintin, or any of Final Fantasy franchised movies).

Because of humour’s profound associations with failure, cool comedy is always the hardest element to do, or get just right, with any charm or genuine wit. The lack of any consistent style or quality for numerous animated action-sequences means this distractingly frantic tempo can eventually detract from audience involvement in the story-telling verve. Super-villain the Spot was a scientist transformed into a malevolent force threatening everyone concerned. Futurism during the later 2099 scenes is notable for its space-elevator, and a Spidey matrix with techie avatars. The cliff-hanger ending of Across The Spider-Verse provides a twisty finale. Trilogy closer ‘Spider-Man: Beyond The Spider-Verse’ is reportedly now in development. 

Blu-ray extras:

- Commentary track 

- Featurettes include:

  • Creating the Ultimate Spider-Man movie
  • “I’mma Do My Own Thing” Inter-dimensional Destiny
  • Raising A Hero
  • Across The Worlds: Designing New Dimensions
  • Designing Spiders and Spots
  • Across The Comics-verse
  • Your Friendly Neighbourhood Spider-Cast
  • Obscure Spiders and Easter Eggs
  • Scratches, Score, and the Music of the Multi-verse
  • Escape From Spider-Society

- Deleted scenes

- Music videos